Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
2004-3-30
pubmed:abstractText
Mobilized peripheral blood collections, obtained following either chemotherapy (with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)) or G-CSF administration alone, are rapidly replacing traditional bone marrow harvests as the source of cells for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. According to the Autologous Blood and Marrow Transplant and the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registries, for the years 1998 through 2000, blood stem cell (BSC) transplants accounted for about 80% of autologous transplants in the pediatric age group and more than 90% of the autologous transplants among adults. In allogeneic transplantation, where the donor is a healthy family member or normal volunteer, G-CSF-mobilized BSC transplants are being used more and more frequently, accounting for about 20% of allogeneic transplants in the pediatric age range and more than 40% of allogeneic transplants among adults during the same time period. It is not, therefore, too great a stretch to imagine that BSC transplants will soon be, if not already, in the majority for allogeneic transplantation among adults. The principal reason why this is happening is the prevailing view that BSC engraft more rapidly than marrow stem cells (MSC). However, this view is based on comparisons between primed circulating blood cells (BSC) and unprimed resident marrow cells in the steady state (SS-MSC). If the reason why BSC engraft faster than SS-MSC were a consequence of G-CSF used for mobilization, then would priming of MSC by G-CSF (Prim-MSC) accelerate engraftment of marrow as well? We reviewed the literature of the last 10 years to see if there were enough data to answer this question.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
0301-472X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
32
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
327-39
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:15050742-Adult, pubmed-meshheading:15050742-Blood Cell Count, pubmed-meshheading:15050742-Bone Marrow Transplantation, pubmed-meshheading:15050742-Case-Control Studies, pubmed-meshheading:15050742-Child, pubmed-meshheading:15050742-Disease-Free Survival, pubmed-meshheading:15050742-Graft Survival, pubmed-meshheading:15050742-Graft vs Host Disease, pubmed-meshheading:15050742-Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor, pubmed-meshheading:15050742-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization, pubmed-meshheading:15050742-Hematopoietic Stem Cells, pubmed-meshheading:15050742-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:15050742-Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation, pubmed-meshheading:15050742-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, pubmed-meshheading:15050742-Registries, pubmed-meshheading:15050742-Survival Analysis, pubmed-meshheading:15050742-Transplantation, Autologous, pubmed-meshheading:15050742-Transplantation, Homologous, pubmed-meshheading:15050742-Treatment Outcome
pubmed:year
2004
pubmed:articleTitle
Primed marrow for autologous and allogeneic transplantation: a review comparing primed marrow to mobilized blood and steady-state marrow.
pubmed:affiliation
Blood and Marrow Transplant Program, Roger Williams Medical Center, Providence, RI 02908, USA. gelfenbein@rwmc.org
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S., Review, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Evaluation Studies