Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15041455
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
4
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2004-3-25
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections | |
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Apr
|
pubmed:issn |
0009-9260
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
59
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
356-7
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
2004
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Conventional digital subtraction x-ray angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of carotid disease: patient satisfaction and preferences.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Clinical Radiology, Hope Hospital, Salford, Manchester, UK. nigel.hoggard@srht.nhs.uk
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comment
|