|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:issue |
Pt 2
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2004-3-17
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Following the introduction of two-site immunometric assays for parathyroid hormone (PTH), the expectation of good inter-assay agreement has not been fulfilled. The reasons for this may include differences in standardization as well as fragment recognition between the assays.
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
|
pubmed:chemical |
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Mar
|
|
pubmed:issn |
0004-5632
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
|
pubmed:volume |
41
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
149-54
|
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
|
|
pubmed:year |
2004
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Major method-specific differences in the measurement of intact parathyroid hormone: studies in patients with and without chronic renal failure.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, Western Australia 6009.
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|
