Linked Life Data

15012581

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15012581

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6 Suppl
pubmed:dateCreated
2004-3-11
pubmed:abstractText
There are internationally agreed optimal methods for developing clinical practice guidelines. The quality of published guidelines varies. A validated assessment instrument should be used to identify well developed guidelines that can be used with confidence. There are multiple ways of presenting guidelines, including computerised systems. Computerisation of guidelines can cover a range of formats, from brief prompts through to complex decision-support systems. Integrating guidelines into computerised reminder systems has been shown to be effective in improving patient care, but there is less evidence to support the effectiveness of guidelines integrated into computerised decision-support systems.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
0025-729X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
15
pubmed:volume
180
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
S52-4
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2004
pubmed:articleTitle
Selecting, presenting and delivering clinical guidelines: are there any "magic bullets"?
pubmed:affiliation
Centre for Health Services Research, 21 Claremont Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AA, UK. martin.eccles@ncl.ac.uk
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't