Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/15000614
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
2
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2004-3-5
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The purpose of this study was to investigate the dose-response characteristics, including ghosting effects, of an amorphous silicon-based electronic portal imaging device (a-Si EPID) under clinical conditions. EPID measurements were performed using one prototype and two commercial a-Si detectors on two linear accelerators: one with 4 and 6 MV and the other with 8 and 18 MV x-ray beams. First, the EPID signal and ionization chamber measurements in a mini-phantom were compared to determine the amount of buildup required for EPID dosimetry. Subsequently, EPID signal characteristics were studied as a function of dose per pulse, pulse repetition frequency (PRF) and total dose, as well as the effects of ghosting. There was an over-response of the EPID signal compared to the ionization chamber of up to 18%, with no additional buildup layer over an air gap range of 10 to 60 cm. The addition of a 2.5 mm thick copper plate sufficiently reduced this over-response to within 1% at clinically relevant patient-detector air gaps (> 40 cm). The response of the EPIDs varied by up to 8% over a large range of dose per pulse values, PRF values and number of monitor units. The EPID response showed an under-response at shorter beam times due to ghosting effects, which depended on the number of exposure frames for a fixed frame acquisition rate. With an appropriate build-up layer and corrections for dose per pulse, PRF and ghosting, the variation in the a-Si EPID response can be reduced to well within +/- 1%.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Feb
|
pubmed:issn |
0094-2405
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
31
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
285-95
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:15000614-Air,
pubmed-meshheading:15000614-Copper,
pubmed-meshheading:15000614-Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation,
pubmed-meshheading:15000614-Image Processing, Computer-Assisted,
pubmed-meshheading:15000614-Ions,
pubmed-meshheading:15000614-Particle Accelerators,
pubmed-meshheading:15000614-Photons,
pubmed-meshheading:15000614-Polystyrenes,
pubmed-meshheading:15000614-Radiometry,
pubmed-meshheading:15000614-Sensitivity and Specificity,
pubmed-meshheading:15000614-Silicon,
pubmed-meshheading:15000614-Time Factors
|
pubmed:year |
2004
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Dose-response and ghosting effects of an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Department of Radiotherapy, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|