Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
1992-9-8
pubmed:abstractText
Several problems confront trials of drugs for migraine: no clinical or biological markers for objective diagnosis are available, severity of the attack cannot be readily evaluated, the placebo effect is significant, and both compliance with therapy and patient follow-up may be difficult to ensure. No statistical method is capable of solving these problems and it is the clinicians' role to minimize them by consistent efforts at establishing good communication with their patients during the trial. Because of these significant intrinsic difficulties, trials of drugs for migraine require especially stringent data collection and analysis protocols in order to minimize the risk of errors which exist in any drug trial. The protocol used have not always been satisfactory with this respect. A rating system for helping non-specialists to evaluate the reliability of migraine drug trials is proposed.
pubmed:language
fre
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
0369-8114
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
40
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
361-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1992
pubmed:articleTitle
[Methodology of clinical trials in migraine: a rating system].
pubmed:affiliation
INSERM U 169, Villejuif, France.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract, Review