Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/14759024
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions |
umls-concept:C0018767,
umls-concept:C0022877,
umls-concept:C0242618,
umls-concept:C0442711,
umls-concept:C0599946,
umls-concept:C0680844,
umls-concept:C0681916,
umls-concept:C0699733,
umls-concept:C0750572,
umls-concept:C1442989,
umls-concept:C1514863,
umls-concept:C1521738,
umls-concept:C1527148,
umls-concept:C1545588,
umls-concept:C1879533,
umls-concept:C1999230
|
pubmed:issue |
1
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2004-2-4
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The mandate of ASA Working Group S12/WG11 has been to develop "laboratory and/or field procedure(s) that yield useful estimates of field performance" of hearing protection devices (HPDs). A real-ear attenuation at threshold procedure was selected, devised, tested for one earmuff and three earplugs via an interlaboratory study involving five laboratories and 147 subjects, and incorporated into a new standard that was approved in 1997 [Royster et al., "Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part I. Research of Working Group 11, Accredited Standards Committee S 12, Noise," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 1506-1526; ANSI, S12.6-1997, "American National Standard method for measuring real-ear attenuation of hearing protectors" (American National Standards Institute, New York, 1997)]. The subject-fit methodology of ANSI S12.6-1997 relies upon listeners who are audiometrically proficient, but inexperienced in the use of HPDs. Whenever a new method is adopted, it is important to know the effects of variability on the power of the measurements. In evaluation of protector noise reduction determined by experimenter-fit, informed-user-fit, and subject-fit methods, interlaboratory reproducibility was found to be best for the subject-fit method. Formulas were derived for determining the minimum detectable difference between attenuation measurements and for determining the number of subjects necessary to achieve a selected level of precision. For a precision of 6 dB, the study found that the minimum number of subjects was 4 for the Bilsom UF-1 earmuff, 10 for the E.A.R Classic earplug, 31 for the Willson EP100 earplug, and 22 for the PlasMed V-51R earplug.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Jan
|
pubmed:issn |
0001-4966
|
pubmed:author |
pubmed-author:BeharAlbertoA,
pubmed-author:BergerElliott HEH,
pubmed-author:CasaliJohn GJG,
pubmed-author:Dixon-ErnstChristineC,
pubmed-author:FranksJohn RJR,
pubmed-author:KriegEdward FEF,
pubmed-author:MozoBen TBT,
pubmed-author:MurphyWilliam JWJ,
pubmed-author:RoysterJulia DJD,
pubmed-author:RoysterLarry HLH,
pubmed-author:SimonStephen DSD,
pubmed-author:StephensonCarolC
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
115
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
311-23
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-12-27
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:14759024-Auditory Threshold,
pubmed-meshheading:14759024-Ear Protective Devices,
pubmed-meshheading:14759024-Equipment Design,
pubmed-meshheading:14759024-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:14759024-Loudness Perception,
pubmed-meshheading:14759024-Noise,
pubmed-meshheading:14759024-Reference Standards,
pubmed-meshheading:14759024-Reproducibility of Results,
pubmed-meshheading:14759024-Sample Size,
pubmed-meshheading:14759024-Sound Spectrography
|
pubmed:year |
2004
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimation of the field attenuation of hearing protection devices: sample size necessary to provide acceptable reproducibility.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Hearing Loss Prevention Section, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway MS C-27, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226, USA. wmurphy@cdc.gov
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
|