Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/14674806
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
6
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2003-12-16
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Past studies have found little or no correlation between workplace protection factors (WPFs) and quantitative fit factors (FFs). This study investigated the effect of good- and poor-fitting half-facepiece, air-purifying respirators on protection in actual workplace environments at a steel foundry and the correlation between WPFs and FFs. Fifteen burners and welders, who wore respirators voluntarily, and chippers participated in this study. Each subject was fit-tested with two respirator models each with three sizes, for a total of six fit-tests. Models and sizes were assigned this way to provide a wide range of FFs among study participants. Each worker donned the respirator twice per day (at the beginning of the shift and following the lunch break) for 2 days. Quantitative FFs were first obtained for each donning using the PortaCount Plus trade mark in a separate room. Without redonning the respirators, workers performed normal work for 1 to 2 hours, and WPFs were measured by collecting ambient and in-facepiece samples simultaneously. A second fit-test was conducted without disturbing the respirator. FFs were obtained by averaging the results from the first and second fit-tests. The resulting FFs had a geometric mean (GM) of 400 (range=10-6010) and a geometric standard deviation (GSD) of 6.1. Of the 55 valid donnings, 43 were good fitting (FFs> or =100) and 12 were poor fitting (FFs<100). The WPFs had a GM of 920 (range=13-230,000) and a GSD of 17.8. The WPFs were found to be significantly correlated with the FFs (R(2)=.55 and p-value=.0001). Therefore, FF was shown to be a meaningful indicator of respirator performance in actual workplace environments.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
1542-8117
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
64
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
730-8
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:14674806-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:14674806-Equipment Design,
pubmed-meshheading:14674806-Equipment Failure,
pubmed-meshheading:14674806-Face,
pubmed-meshheading:14674806-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:14674806-Industry,
pubmed-meshheading:14674806-Job Description,
pubmed-meshheading:14674806-Materials Testing,
pubmed-meshheading:14674806-Quality Control,
pubmed-meshheading:14674806-Respiratory Protective Devices,
pubmed-meshheading:14674806-Steel,
pubmed-meshheading:14674806-Workplace
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Correlation between quantitative fit factors and workplace protection factors measured in actual workplace environments at a steel foundry.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15236, USA.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Evaluation Studies
|