Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6 Suppl
pubmed:dateCreated
2003-12-11
pubmed:abstractText
Cost-effectiveness information can help health-system participants make decisions about diagnostic or therapeutic innovations that are more expensive but incrementally safe and effective. However, these analyses cannot help decide whether a less expensive approach is "sufficient" and funds ought to be allocated to other medical issues entirely. At present, formulary committees are commonly determining that medications are "mostly equivalent" in efficacy and safety and choosing individual medications or classes of medications based on cost. Clinicians may not agree with these decisions and will need to understand their rationale. For prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism after hip and knee replacement and hip fracture surgery, many preventive modalities are available with different safety and efficacy profiles and different costs. It is possible to list the important safety and efficacy outcomes of prophylaxis, estimate their incidences and costs, and "model" comparisons of one modality vs another, in order to help decide whether one is preferable.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
0012-3692
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
124
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
393S-396S
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2003
pubmed:articleTitle
The economics of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: a primer for clinicians.
pubmed:affiliation
Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Division, Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington School of Medicine, 801 Broadway, Suite 915, Seattle, WA 98122, USA. brucedavidson@pobox.com
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't