Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/14659312
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
4
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2003-12-8
|
pubmed:abstractText |
This study examines the influence of work-up on the accuracy of diagnostic mammography in symptomatic women. Subjects were sampled from all women consecutively attending a symptomatic breast clinic and aged 25-55 years (240 women shown to have breast cancer and 240 age-matched women shown not to have cancer). Mammography films were prospectively reported by two radiologists independently of each other and in a blinded manner using two phases of film reading: initially only baseline films were read, then mammography was re-read with work-up films. The accuracy of reporting mammography with and without work-up was compared using sensitivity and specificity, likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Reporting the mammogram with work-up (compared to without any work-up films) improved sensitivity (75.3% vs 69.0%, P=0.059) for one radiologist, with a non-significant gain in specificity (84.5% vs 79.4%, P=0.38). For the other radiologist, it resulted in a non-significant decrease in sensitivity (79.5% vs 83.7%, P=0.14) with a significant increase in specificity (85.6% vs 61.9%, P=0.00001). ROC curves for both radiologists showed that reporting mammography with work-up resulted in significant improvement (4.5% for R1, 6.8% for R2) in overall test accuracy. Our findings support the use of work-up mammography in the diagnostic setting.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Aug
|
pubmed:issn |
0960-9776
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
12
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
270-5
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:14659312-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:14659312-Australia,
pubmed-meshheading:14659312-Breast Neoplasms,
pubmed-meshheading:14659312-Case-Control Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:14659312-Confidence Intervals,
pubmed-meshheading:14659312-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:14659312-Follow-Up Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:14659312-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:14659312-Mammography,
pubmed-meshheading:14659312-Mass Screening,
pubmed-meshheading:14659312-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:14659312-Neoplasm Invasiveness,
pubmed-meshheading:14659312-Probability,
pubmed-meshheading:14659312-Prospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:14659312-ROC Curve,
pubmed-meshheading:14659312-Reference Values,
pubmed-meshheading:14659312-Sensitivity and Specificity
|
pubmed:year |
2003
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
The contribution of work-up or additional views to the accuracy of diagnostic mammography.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Screening & Test Evaluation Program, School of Public Health, A27, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. nehmath@health.usyd.edu.au
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|