Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/14601142
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2003-11-5
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Humans have several mechanisms for the visual perception of motion, including one that is luminance-based (first-order) and another that is luminance-independent (second-order). Recent psychophysical studies have suggested that significant interaction occurs between these two neural processes. We investigated whether such interactions are represented as neural activity measured by magnetoencephalography (MEG). The second-order motion of a drifting sinusoidal grating, which is defined by the speed of the dot motion, did not generate a response. Apparent motion (AM) of the square area, defined by the speed of randomly moving dots, evoked a magnetic response whose latency and amplitude changed with the distance that the area moved (a second-order characteristic), though the response properties were significantly different from those for the first-order AM. AM, defined by both first- and second-order attributes, evoked an MEG response and the latencies and the amplitudes were distributed between those for the first- and second-order motions. The cortical source of the response was estimated to be around MT+. The results show a distinct difference in the neural processing of the second-order motion that cannot be explained by the difference in visibility, and they indicate that the interaction of the neural processes underlying first- and second-order motion detection occurs before the MEG response. Our study provides the first physiological evidence of a neural interaction between the two types of early motion detection.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Nov
|
pubmed:issn |
1065-9471
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:copyrightInfo |
Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
20
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
158-67
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:14601142-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:14601142-Brain Mapping,
pubmed-meshheading:14601142-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:14601142-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:14601142-Light,
pubmed-meshheading:14601142-Magnetoencephalography,
pubmed-meshheading:14601142-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:14601142-Motion,
pubmed-meshheading:14601142-Motion Perception,
pubmed-meshheading:14601142-Photic Stimulation,
pubmed-meshheading:14601142-Psychophysics,
pubmed-meshheading:14601142-Visual Cortex,
pubmed-meshheading:14601142-Visual Perception
|
pubmed:year |
2003
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Physiological evidence of interaction of first- and second-order motion processes in the human visual system: a magnetoencephalographic study.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Integrative Physiology, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, Japan.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|