Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
2003-10-17
pubmed:abstractText
Beta blockers have been shown to prolong survival in chronic heart failure. It is currently a matter of debate whether any beta blocker is superior to the other in terms of improving symptoms, left ventricular function, or prognosis. A number of comparative studies have been performed with metoprolol, a beta1-selective second-generation beta blocker, and carvedilol, a nonselective and vasodilatative third-generation beta blocker. This review will focus on the different pharmacological profiles of carvedilol and metoprolol as well as on the clinical consequences derived from these differences. The results indicate that in some studies carvedilol is superior to metoprolol in improving left ventricular ejection fraction. However, because there is no conclusive evidence that carvedilol is superior to metoprolol in terms of prognosis, it is not justified to substitute metoprolol with carvedilol. Comparative data on mortality reduction are not available before termination of the Carvedilol or Metoprolol European Trial. Nevertheless, the different effects of both beta blockers on the beta-adrenergic system have an impact on tolerability and beta-adrenergic responsiveness and thus exercise tolerance in heart-failure patients.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
1527-5299
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
9
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
263-70
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Beta-blocker treatment of chronic heart failure: comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol.
pubmed:affiliation
Division of Cardiology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205-2195, USA. christophmaack@yahoo.de
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't