|
rdf:type |
|
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
|
pubmed:issue |
3
|
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2003-10-6
|
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Severe upper GI hemorrhage from an actively bleeding peptic ulcer is sometimes difficult to treat by conventional endoscopic means, such as multipolar electrocoagulation, heat probe coagulation, and injection therapy. It was hypothesized that monopolar coagulation with a "hot biopsy" forceps may be more effective in such cases.
|
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
|
pubmed:journal |
|
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
|
pubmed:chemical |
|
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
|
pubmed:month |
Sep
|
|
pubmed:issn |
0016-5107
|
|
pubmed:author |
|
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
|
pubmed:volume |
58
|
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
|
pubmed:pagination |
323-9
|
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:14528202-Duodenal Ulcer,
pubmed-meshheading:14528202-Electrocoagulation,
pubmed-meshheading:14528202-Epinephrine,
pubmed-meshheading:14528202-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:14528202-Hemostasis, Endoscopic,
pubmed-meshheading:14528202-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:14528202-Logistic Models,
pubmed-meshheading:14528202-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:14528202-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:14528202-Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage,
pubmed-meshheading:14528202-Prospective Studies,
pubmed-meshheading:14528202-Recurrence,
pubmed-meshheading:14528202-Stomach Ulcer,
pubmed-meshheading:14528202-Treatment Outcome
|
|
pubmed:year |
2003
|
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Monopolar coagulation versus conventional endoscopic treatment for high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding: a prospective, randomized study.
|
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Gastroenterology, ChangHua Christian Medical Center, Taiwan, ROC.
|
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Randomized Controlled Trial
|
