Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
12
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1993-1-7
|
pubmed:abstractText |
We compared the results of the E test MIC method with the results of agar dilution susceptibility testing for 18 antimicrobial agents against 324 strains of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including 99 strains of staphylococci, 101 strains of antimicrobial-resistant gram-negative bacteria, 40 strains of enterococci, and 84 isolates of Campylobacter jejuni. Overall agreement of MICs (+/- 1 log2 dilution) was 97.3% for staphylococci, 94.6% for gram-negative bacilli, and 100.0% for enterococci. The MIC results for C. jejuni showed an overall agreement of only 82.9%. This was due primarily to a number of offscale values that limited the number of comparisons with clindamycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline. Interpretative criteria for the results of the two test methods, however, were similar. Overall, the E test produced MIC results comparable to those of agar dilution when multiresistant organisms were tested. However, it was necessary to add 2% NaCl to the agar when testing oxacillin against staphylococci for both the E test and agar dilution to obtain results comparable to those of the broth microdilution method.
|
pubmed:commentsCorrections |
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452709-1500524,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452709-1643828,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452709-1734054,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452709-1774337,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452709-1802537,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452709-1929268,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452709-1939571,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452709-1993744,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452709-2037671,
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452709-2055809
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Dec
|
pubmed:issn |
0095-1137
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
30
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
3243-8
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2010-9-7
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:1452709-Bacteria,
pubmed-meshheading:1452709-Campylobacter jejuni,
pubmed-meshheading:1452709-Drug Resistance, Microbial,
pubmed-meshheading:1452709-Enterococcus,
pubmed-meshheading:1452709-Evaluation Studies as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:1452709-Gram-Negative Bacteria,
pubmed-meshheading:1452709-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:1452709-Microbial Sensitivity Tests,
pubmed-meshheading:1452709-Staphylococcus
|
pubmed:year |
1992
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Accuracy of the E test for determining antimicrobial susceptibilities of staphylococci, enterococci, Campylobacter jejuni, and gram-negative bacteria resistant to antimicrobial agents.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Nosocomial Pathogens Laboratory Branch, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia 30333.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|