| pubmed-article:1452671 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0007634 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0008151 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1550252 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C2004454 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1511790 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1707455 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1261188 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1706070 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:issue | 11 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1993-1-6 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:abstractText | Endocervical swab and cytobrush specimens from 1,301 symptomatic women were microscopically analyzed for adequacy and tested using Chlamydiazyme (CZ) (Abbott Laboratories). When the swab specimen was collected first, blocking antibody-confirmed CZ-positive results were obtained from 48 (8.0%) of 599 patients, 42 (87.5%) from swabs and 46 (95.8%) from cytobrushes (not significant). When the swab specimen was collected second, confirmed CZ-positive results were obtained from 46 (6.6%) of 702 patients, 44 (95.6%) from swabs and 41 (89.1%) from cytobrushes (not significant). Cytobrushes offered no significant advantage over swabs for CZ detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:month | Nov | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:issn | 0095-1137 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KelloggJ AJA | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:LeviskyJ SJS | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SeipleJ WJW | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KlinedinstJ... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:volume | 30 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:pagination | 2988-90 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2010-9-7 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1452671-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1452671-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1452671-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1452671-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1452671-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1452671-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1452671-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1452671-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1452671-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1452671-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1452671-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1452671-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:year | 1992 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:articleTitle | Comparison of cytobrushes with swabs for recovery of endocervical cells and for Chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:affiliation | Immunology Laboratory, York Hospital, Pennsylvania 17405. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1452671 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:1452671 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:1452671 | lld:pubmed |
