Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
11
pubmed:dateCreated
1993-1-6
pubmed:abstractText
Endocervical swab and cytobrush specimens from 1,301 symptomatic women were microscopically analyzed for adequacy and tested using Chlamydiazyme (CZ) (Abbott Laboratories). When the swab specimen was collected first, blocking antibody-confirmed CZ-positive results were obtained from 48 (8.0%) of 599 patients, 42 (87.5%) from swabs and 46 (95.8%) from cytobrushes (not significant). When the swab specimen was collected second, confirmed CZ-positive results were obtained from 46 (6.6%) of 702 patients, 44 (95.6%) from swabs and 41 (89.1%) from cytobrushes (not significant). Cytobrushes offered no significant advantage over swabs for CZ detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-1697602, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-1722665, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-1889175, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-2199483, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-2254422, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-2413670, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-2648349, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-2650858, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-2671035, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-2753999, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-3049302, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-3230139, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-3282335, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-3294888, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-3305720, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-3312290, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-3326709, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-3517035, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-4002095, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-4568461, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-7013681, http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/commentcorrection/1452671-7218478
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Nov
pubmed:issn
0095-1137
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
30
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
2988-90
pubmed:dateRevised
2010-9-7
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1992
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison of cytobrushes with swabs for recovery of endocervical cells and for Chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
pubmed:affiliation
Immunology Laboratory, York Hospital, Pennsylvania 17405.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study