| pubmed-article:14516874 | pubmed:abstractText | Information about the impact of race/ethnicity on adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the modern era is limited. Using consecutive patients from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry, this study investigated differences in clinical presentation, treatment strategy, and acute and long-term outcomes in 3,669 white, 446 black, 301 Hispanic, and 201 Asian patients who underwent PCI. All comparisons were made to whites. Blacks were more likely than whites to be younger, women, and to present with a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, and smoking). Hispanics tended to be younger, hypertensive, diabetic, and to be undergoing their first cardiovascular procedure. Asians were, on average, younger, men, and presented more often with hypertension and diabetes than whites. Although the rate of stent implantation was significantly lower in blacks compared with whites (63% vs 74%, p <0.001), angiographic and procedural success rates were high (> or =95%) and did not differ by race/ethnicity. In-hospital mortality (0.2% vs 1.7%, p <0.05) and death/myocardial infarction (MI)/coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (3.1% vs 5.5%, p <0.05) were lower in blacks. All other in-hospital complications were similar to whites. At 1 year, there were no statistical differences in cumulative adverse event rates by ethnicity; however by 2 years there was a modestly higher mortality rate (adjusted RR 1.87; 95% confidence interval 1.15 to 3.04) and adverse event rate (death/MI, death/MI/CABG) among black patients. Thus, although differences in patient demographics, clinical presentation, angiographic characteristics and treatment strategies did not impact the incidence of acute and 1-year adverse outcomes of non-whites, there appears to be a significant reduction in event-free survival among blacks by 2 years. | lld:pubmed |
