Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
2003-9-30
pubmed:abstractText
In the current legislative debate about mandating parity of insurance coverage for mental disorders, many question the use of DSM-IV diagnostic criteria to indicate benefit eligibility. Some have indicated that resistance to adopting parity legislation has been driven by inadequacies in the theory underlying psychiatric diagnosis. This paper takes issue with that perspective and reviews the scientific basis for the current classification and the advances in research and clinical practice made possible by reliable diagnostic criteria. As hypotheses that are subject to empirical testing, the DSM-IV criteria have set the stage for further advances-independent of the economic and political forces that are now playing out in the parity debate.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0278-2715
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
22
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
21-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Mental disorder diagnostic theory and practical reality: an evolutionary perspective.
pubmed:affiliation
American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Evaluation of the American Psychiatric Association, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comment