Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/14512345
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
14
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2003-9-26
|
pubmed:abstractText |
This paper reports a graph-theoretic program, GRATH, that rapidly, and accurately, matches a novel structure against a library of domain structures to find the most similar ones. GRATH generates distributions of scores by comparing the novel domain against the different types of folds that have been classified previously in the CATH database of structural domains. GRATH uses a measure of similarity that details the geometric information, number of secondary structures and number of residues within secondary structures, that any two protein structures share. Although GRATH builds on well established approaches for secondary structure comparison, a novel scoring scheme has been introduced to allow ranking of any matches identified by the algorithm. More importantly, we have benchmarked the algorithm using a large dataset of 1702 non-redundant structures from the CATH database which have already been classified into fold groups, with manual validation. This has facilitated introduction of further constraints, optimization of parameters and identification of reliable thresholds for fold identification. Following these benchmarking trials, the correct fold can be identified with the top score with a frequency of 90%. It is identified within the ten most likely assignments with a frequency of 98%. GRATH has been implemented to use via a server (http://www.biochem.ucl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/cath/Grath.pl). GRATH's speed and accuracy means that it can be used as a reliable front-end filter for the more accurate, but computationally expensive, residue based structure comparison algorithm SSAP, currently used to classify domain structures in the CATH database. With an increasing number of structures being solved by the structural genomics initiatives, the GRATH server also provides an essential resource for determining whether newly determined structures are related to any known structures from which functional properties may be inferred.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Sep
|
pubmed:issn |
1367-4803
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:day |
22
|
pubmed:volume |
19
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
1748-59
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:14512345-Algorithms,
pubmed-meshheading:14512345-Amino Acid Sequence,
pubmed-meshheading:14512345-Cluster Analysis,
pubmed-meshheading:14512345-Databases, Protein,
pubmed-meshheading:14512345-Molecular Sequence Data,
pubmed-meshheading:14512345-Pattern Recognition, Automated,
pubmed-meshheading:14512345-Protein Conformation,
pubmed-meshheading:14512345-Protein Folding,
pubmed-meshheading:14512345-Protein Structure, Secondary,
pubmed-meshheading:14512345-Protein Structure, Tertiary,
pubmed-meshheading:14512345-Proteins,
pubmed-meshheading:14512345-Sequence Alignment,
pubmed-meshheading:14512345-Sequence Analysis, Protein
|
pubmed:year |
2003
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Recognizing the fold of a protein structure.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Biomolecular Structure and Modelling Unit, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't,
Evaluation Studies,
Validation Studies
|