Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
10
pubmed:dateCreated
1992-12-30
pubmed:abstractText
The clinician plays a key role in the detection and diagnosis of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The diagnosis of ADRs, however, is a complex task. In the past, there were no systematically applied diagnostic criteria for ADRs, no formal methods of case analysis, no standardized epidemiologic approaches, and a limited knowledge of mechanisms. This resulted in the overdiagnosis of ADRs, which has negative consequences such as limiting treatment options. Recently, there have been various improvements in the diagnosis of ADRs, such as the development of standardized decision aids and of in vitro diagnostic tests. This article briefly reviews some of this knowledge, discusses the role of in vivo and in vitro rechallenge, and summarizes a probabilistic approach for collecting relevant information and diagnosing ADRs. The intention is to increase awareness of the different approaches for diagnosing ADRs as well as to stimulate researchers to continue to collect pharmacoepidemiologic information, study the pharmacologic, immunologic, and genetic factors involved in the pathogenesis of drug reactions, and develop and test new diagnostic instruments under various clinical conditions.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Oct
pubmed:issn
0091-2700
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
32
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
897-904
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1992
pubmed:articleTitle
Advances in the diagnosis of adverse drug reactions.
pubmed:affiliation
Clinical Pharmacology Program, Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't