Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1422724rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0543467lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1422724lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205246lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1422724lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1704775lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1422724lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0681814lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1422724lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0809949lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:issue10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:dateCreated1992-12-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:abstractTextIn 1991, 1025 general surgical Fellows of The Royal College of Surgeons of England were circulated with a pro forma and asked to submit local audit results for admissions during 1990 to a confidential comparative audit service. The individual topics of cholecystectomy and colorectal resection were studied. Data returned by 160 surgeons concerned 147,882 admissions including 122,620 operations. Overall mortality rates ranged from 0 to 5 per cent and morbidity rates from 0 to 22 per cent. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was associated with one-quarter of the mortality rate and two-thirds the morbidity rate of open cholecystectomy. Of the 33 surgeons who responded to a survey after the presentation of results, all wished to continue the exercise in future years; 39 per cent had been stimulated to perform further analyses and 15 per cent had changed practice habits as a result. Comparative audit involving large numbers of patients and surgeons is feasible and seems beneficial to participants.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:issn0007-1323lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DunnD CDClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FowlerSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:volume79lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:pagination1073-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1422724-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1422724-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1422724-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1422724-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1422724-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1422724-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1422724-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1422724-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1422724-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:year1992lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:articleTitleComparative audit: an experimental study of 147,882 general surgical admissions during 1990.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:affiliationConfidential Comparative Audit Service, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1422724pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1422724lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1422724lld:pubmed