Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
10
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1992-12-21
|
pubmed:abstractText |
In 1991, 1025 general surgical Fellows of The Royal College of Surgeons of England were circulated with a pro forma and asked to submit local audit results for admissions during 1990 to a confidential comparative audit service. The individual topics of cholecystectomy and colorectal resection were studied. Data returned by 160 surgeons concerned 147,882 admissions including 122,620 operations. Overall mortality rates ranged from 0 to 5 per cent and morbidity rates from 0 to 22 per cent. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was associated with one-quarter of the mortality rate and two-thirds the morbidity rate of open cholecystectomy. Of the 33 surgeons who responded to a survey after the presentation of results, all wished to continue the exercise in future years; 39 per cent had been stimulated to perform further analyses and 15 per cent had changed practice habits as a result. Comparative audit involving large numbers of patients and surgeons is feasible and seems beneficial to participants.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
AIM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Oct
|
pubmed:issn |
0007-1323
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
79
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
1073-6
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2004-11-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:1422724-Cholecystectomy,
pubmed-meshheading:1422724-Colon,
pubmed-meshheading:1422724-Hospital Mortality,
pubmed-meshheading:1422724-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:1422724-Length of Stay,
pubmed-meshheading:1422724-Medical Audit,
pubmed-meshheading:1422724-Morbidity,
pubmed-meshheading:1422724-Rectum,
pubmed-meshheading:1422724-Surgical Procedures, Operative
|
pubmed:year |
1992
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Comparative audit: an experimental study of 147,882 general surgical admissions during 1990.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Confidential Comparative Audit Service, Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, UK.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|