Linked Life Data

1419286

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/1419286

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
12
pubmed:dateCreated
1992-12-4
pubmed:abstractText
We compared the management and outcome of 999 women with breast cancer presenting between 1982 and 1986 at two centres in a region, one in a teaching district. A comparison was also made with relevant research and The Kings Fund Consensus Statement. The centres frequently differed markedly in the investigations done, diagnostic procedures, histology reporting, axillary sampling, and in the treatment given, also differing from the Consensus with no trend towards it. Survival was better at the teaching centre, both disease-free (N.S.) and overall [odds ratio 1.46 (1.16-1.84) P = 0.0009 unadjusted]. This should be interpreted cautiously as the median follow-up time was relatively short and the study was non-randomised. We conclude that how women with breast cancer are managed is determined as much by where they are referred as by scientific evidence. This indicates the need to introduce standards and protocols into business plans, making audit and service specifications easier.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0959-8049
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
28A
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1945-50
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1992
pubmed:articleTitle
Variations in breast cancer management between a teaching and a non-teaching district.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Public Health Medicine, Bloomsbury and Islington Health Authority, London, U.K.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't