Linked Life Data

1320913

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/1320913

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:dateCreated
1992-8-17
pubmed:abstractText
The safety and efficacy of intravenous granisetron were compared with combinations of conventional antiemetics in two single-blind, parallel-group studies which have been reported previously. In this review updated data from both studies is presented. In both studies granisetron (40 micrograms/kg) was given as a single 5-min infusion before chemotherapy with two additional doses allowed to control subsequent nausea and vomiting. All patients were naive to chemotherapy. Patients due to receive cisplatin (greater than 49 mg/m2) were randomly assigned to receive either granisetron alone or metoclopramide (3 mg/kg) plus dexamethasone (12 mg) given prophylactically followed by an 8-h infusion of metoclopramide (4 mg/kg). In the 24 h after the start of chemotherapy 70% of granisetron-treated patients and 67% of comparator group were complete responders. In patients due to receive moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, granisetron was compared with chlorpromazine (up to 200 mg/24 h) plus dexamethasone (12 mg). Twenty-four hour efficacy was significantly higher in the granisetron group with complete response in 68% of patients compared to 47% in the comparator group (P less than 0.001). A subset of 40 patients in this study were crossed over to receive the alternative antiemetic on their next cycle of chemotherapy. A significant majority of patients (32/34; 94%) preferred granisetron (P less than 0.001). Around 80% of the granisetron-treated patients in both groups required only a single prophylactic dose of granisetron. Following the first additional dose of granisetron, around 87% of patients reported symptoms to be improved or resolved. Adverse experience reporting was higher in the comparator groups with somnolence and extrapyramidal reactions representing the most common events. Headache was the most commonly reported adverse experience in granisetron-treated patients. Granisetron has proved safe and effective in controlling chemotherapy-induced emesis and is more convenient to administer than conventional antiemetics.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
0959-8049
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
28A Suppl 1
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
S12-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1992
pubmed:articleTitle
A comparison of granisetron as a single agent with conventional combination antiemetic therapies in the treatment of cytostatic-induced emesis. The Granisetron Study Group.
pubmed:affiliation
Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Randomized Controlled Trial