Linked Life Data

12892690

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/12892690

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
8
pubmed:dateCreated
2003-8-1
pubmed:abstractText
Members of the International Continence Society (UK section) were randomised to receive a scenario comprising clinical and urodynamic data of a woman with urodynamic stress incontinence, including a one-hour pad loss of either 42 g (large loss) or 7 g (small loss). Members were asked to indicate their initial management choice from a list of four options. Three hundred and fifteen of 440 (72%) members responded. Gynaecologists and urologists were significantly more likely to choose surgical treatment for patients with a large pad loss (24% vs 8%; difference 15.8%, 95% CI 2.9-28.7), despite published data demonstrating the poor reproducibility and reliability of the pad test.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Aug
pubmed:issn
1470-0328
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
110
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
771-3
pubmed:dateRevised
2004-11-17
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2003
pubmed:articleTitle
The influence of pad test loss on management of women with urodynamic stress incontinence.
pubmed:affiliation
Arrowe Park Hospital, Upton, Wirral, UK.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Randomized Controlled Trial