Linked Life Data

1286414

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/1286414

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
780
pubmed:dateCreated
1993-3-18
pubmed:abstractText
The aim of this study was to assess if quantitative classification of the chest radiograph appearance at 7 days predicted chronic oxygen dependency (oxygen dependency beyond 8 weeks of age) more accurately than did subjective classification at 28 days of age. Thirty preterm infants, median gestational age 27 weeks, who had chest radiographs taken for clinical purposes at 7 and 28 days of age, were recruited into the study. The 7-day chest radiograph was scored according to the lung volume, presence of opacification, interstitial changes, pulmonary interstitial emphysema and cystic elements. The range of chest radiograph scores was from 0-18, a score of 18 indicating the most abnormal appearance. The 28-day chest radiograph was classified as Type I or Type II chronic lung disease (CLD), according to the presence or absence, respectively, of coarse reticulation. The median chest radiograph score at 7 days of the 30 infants was 5 (range 2-14). In predicting chronic oxygen dependency, a chest radiograph score of 5 at 7 days had 83% sensitivity and 75% specificity, but a diagnosis of Type II CLD at 28 days of age had only 67% sensitivity and 67% specificity. We conclude that a quantitative assessment of the chest radiograph appearance at 7 days is more useful than a subjective assessment at 28 days of age.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
0007-1285
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
65
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
1083-5
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1992
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison of a subjective and a quantitative assessment of the neonatal chest radiograph.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Child Health, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study