Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
51
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
1976-3-1
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Fine needle aspiration biopsy is generally a harmless method if contraindications are considered and provides sufficient tissue for cytological evaluation. The diagnostic value is very high: in 27 cases of metastatic tumours of the liver diagnosed by laparoscopy the diagnosis was confirmed in 26 cases and revised in one case. In a control group of 200 patients with various diffuse liver diseases or morphologically normal findings no false positive results were found. In no case were post-biopsy haemorrhage or other complications observed. Needle biopsy and cytological evaluation should be used with an increased frequency when a malignant tumour of the liver is suspected clinically. After primary localization of suspicious areas by ultrasound or scanning the pick-up rate is high. Laparoscopy with precisely aimed fine needle biopsy is the method for verifying the diagnosis in cases with cytologically negative results which is up to 100% accurate.
|
pubmed:language |
ger
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Dec
|
pubmed:issn |
0012-0472
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:day |
19
|
pubmed:volume |
100
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
2602-4
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading | |
pubmed:year |
1975
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
[Diagnostic value of cytological investigations in metastatic tumours of the liver: comparison of laparoscopy, histology, and cytology (author's transl)].
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
English Abstract
|