Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
2003-5-16
pubmed:abstractText
The aim of this paper was to examine all studies that compared operative and conservative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Covering a period of 22 years all relevant articles were retrieved from the medical databases Medline, Embase, and Cochrane. The results of these studies were judged on to the criteria of subjective stability (giving-way phenomenon), objective stability (pivot shift test), and return to the preinjury level of sports. There were 11 different studies published in 16 articles consisting of 2 randomized,2 prospective, and 7 retrospective trials. Except in one study the results in the operative groups were always better than in the conservative groups. The meta-analysis of both randomized studies showed significant advantages for the operative treatment. Although arthroscopic ligament plasty is an established standard method for the treatment of ACL rupture, there is almost no basis for this procedure in the literature.Thus,new clinically applicable studies are necessary to develop objective guidelines for the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament tears.
pubmed:language
ger
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
May
pubmed:issn
0177-5537
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
106
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
374-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-3
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2003
pubmed:articleTitle
[Operative or conservative treatment of anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a systematic review of the literature].
pubmed:affiliation
Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik Klinikum Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich. stefan.hinterwimmer@ch-i.med.uni-muenchen.de
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract, Meta-Analysis