Linked Life Data

12715604

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/12715604

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
2003-4-28
pubmed:abstractText
The purpose of this study was to provide evidence of the inter-rater reliability, validity, and sensitivity of a subset of Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) measures, including 26 found to be "most clinically useful" in a nurse practitioner setting (NPS). Selected NPS results are compared to those obtained from a larger 10-site study. Results indicated that the measures are valid, reliable, and sensitive as clinical measures of nursing outcomes. Proper education of users can enhance psychometrics. Suggestions for strengthening the measures and further study are outlined.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
N
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
1535-2765
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
7
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
74-83
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-14
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:articleTitle
Establishing the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of NOC in an adult care nurse practitioner setting.
pubmed:affiliation
University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Mich., MI 48109, USA. gkeenan@umich.edu
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.