Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/12715567
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
13
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2003-4-28
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Disagreement on how to assess grade 1 pressure ulcers has partly come about because there is no national grading system. There is debate about whether grade 1 ulcers are characterised by blanching or non-blanching erythema, whether damage starts at the epidermis or deeper at the interface of soft tissue and bone, and whether grade 1 ulcers are reversible. Purple ulcers are sometimes considered grade 1 tissue damage when, in fact, they signify full thickness skin loss. A review of the evidence can help to clarify the matter.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
N
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
0954-7762
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
99
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
73-5
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2005-11-17
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:12715567-Documentation,
pubmed-meshheading:12715567-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:12715567-Nursing Assessment,
pubmed-meshheading:12715567-Nursing Diagnosis,
pubmed-meshheading:12715567-Pressure Ulcer,
pubmed-meshheading:12715567-Prognosis,
pubmed-meshheading:12715567-Risk Assessment
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Controversies in classifying and assessing grade 1 pressure ulcers.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
City Hospital NHS Trust, Birmingham.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|