Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
7
pubmed:dateCreated
2003-4-1
pubmed:abstractText
Because many episodes of ventricular fibrillation (VF) are believed to be triggered by ventricular tachycardia (VT), patients who present with VT or VF are usually grouped together in discussions of natural history and treatment. However, there are significant differences in the clinical profiles of these 2 patient groups, and some studies have suggested differences in their response to therapy. We examined arrhythmias occurring spontaneously in 449 patients assigned to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) trial to determine whether patients who receive an ICD after VT have arrhythmias during follow-up that are different from patients who present with VF. ICD printouts were analyzed both by a committee blinded to the patients' original presenting arrhythmia and by the local investigator. During 31 +/- 14 months of follow-up, 2,673 therapies were reported. Patients who were enrolled in the AVID trial after an episode of VT were more likely to have an episode of VT (73.5% vs 30.1%, p <0.001), and were less likely to have an episode of VF (18.3% vs 28.0%, p = 0.013) than patients enrolled after an episode of VF. Adjustment for differences in ejection fraction, previous infarction, and beta-blocker and antiarrhythmic therapy did not appreciably change the results. Ventricular arrhythmia recurrence during follow-up is different in patients who originally present with VT than in those who originally present with VF. These findings suggest there are important differences in the electrophysiologic characteristics of these 2 patient populations.
pubmed:grant
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
AIM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
0002-9149
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:day
1
pubmed:volume
91
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
812-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed-meshheading:12667566-Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, pubmed-meshheading:12667566-Aged, pubmed-meshheading:12667566-Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, pubmed-meshheading:12667566-Arrhythmias, Cardiac, pubmed-meshheading:12667566-Defibrillators, Implantable, pubmed-meshheading:12667566-Electrocardiography, pubmed-meshheading:12667566-Female, pubmed-meshheading:12667566-Follow-Up Studies, pubmed-meshheading:12667566-Humans, pubmed-meshheading:12667566-Incidence, pubmed-meshheading:12667566-Male, pubmed-meshheading:12667566-Middle Aged, pubmed-meshheading:12667566-Predictive Value of Tests, pubmed-meshheading:12667566-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, pubmed-meshheading:12667566-Recurrence, pubmed-meshheading:12667566-Risk Factors, pubmed-meshheading:12667566-Stroke Volume, pubmed-meshheading:12667566-Tachycardia, Ventricular, pubmed-meshheading:12667566-Time Factors, pubmed-meshheading:12667566-Treatment Outcome, pubmed-meshheading:12667566-Ventricular Fibrillation
pubmed:year
2003
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison of arrhythmia recurrence in patients presenting with ventricular fibrillation versus ventricular tachycardia in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) trial.
pubmed:affiliation
Portland VA Medical Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA. avidctc@u.washington.edu
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S., Randomized Controlled Trial