Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
2003-3-4
pubmed:abstractText
Asthma is a common chronic disease resulting in significant morbidity and health resource utilisation, and multiple therapeutic options exist. Clinicians and healthcare providers need accurate information on the clinical and cost- effectiveness of asthma treatments to make informed decisions on management strategies. Randomised, controlled trials demonstrate cause and effect relationships between treatments and outcomes, but their tight entry criteria and strict study protocols mean that their results cannot automatically be generalised or used for economic modelling. There is a need for observational data to examine the effectiveness of alternative interventions in routine practice. Clinical and administrative databases are a possible information source for observational studies, and are increasingly used in asthma clinical, epidemiological and economic research. This paper examines the types of database used, the advantages and limitations of such studies and considers quality markers. High quality database studies can provide important epidemiological and economic information that can be of value in understanding the causes and effective management of asthma.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
1465-6566
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
4
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
351-8
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2003
pubmed:articleTitle
Database studies in asthma pharmacoeconomics: uses, limitations and quality markers.
pubmed:affiliation
University of Aberdeen, Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Foresterhill Health Centre, Westburn Road, UK. mikethomas@doctors.org.uk
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review