Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
2003-2-6
pubmed:abstractText
Complete hydatidiform mole and partial hydatidiform mole are two abnormal conceptuses that may be identified by clinical, ultrasonographic, gross morphological, histological, and genetic characteristics. Among all these criteria, the specific diagnosis is generally confirmed only upon histological review. However, an accurate diagnosis based on morphological criteria is difficult and several studies have shown that misclassifications are frequent, even for experienced pathologists. An erroneous diagnosis may imply that women are either not enrolled in an adequate beta-hCG follow-up with the risk that hydatidiform mole (HM) progresses to choriocarcinoma, or are enrolled in an unnecessary follow-up. A reliable and complementary method to the pathologic interpretation is a genetic study of the conceptus to eliminate the diagnostic dilemma by distinguishing non-molar spontaneous abortions from HM and to define the type of HM. The aim of our study was to review the genetic basis of HM and discuss its relevance in the routine management of the disorder.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0268-1161
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
18
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
243-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2009-11-19
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2003
pubmed:articleTitle
Is genetic analysis useful in the routine management of hydatidiform mole?
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals of Geneva, Boulevard de la Cluse 30, 1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland. patrick.petignat@hcuge.ch
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review