Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
1
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1976-5-25
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
Clinical investigations and plain film of the spine are not sufficient for diagnosis of three-level lumbar nucleus pulposus prolapse. Contrast investigations, especially radiculography with television monitoring, are particularly suitable for demonstration of multiple prolapses. In a material of 730 cases two-level prolapse was found in about 12% of cases and three-level prolapse in about 0.5% of cases and this suggests that radiculography should be carried out routinely before each operation for lumbar nucleus pulposus prolapse.
|
| pubmed:language |
pol
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:issn |
0028-3843
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
10
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
97-100
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2011-11-17
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:articleTitle |
[Diagnosis of 3-level lumbar nucleus pulposus prolapse].
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
English Abstract,
Case Reports
|