Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
3
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1976-6-2
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
We evaluated and inter-compared several newer methods for CO2 analysis--titrimetric (Van Slyke), automatic titrator, continuous-flow/indicator, and coupled-enzyme procedures--with respect to accuracy, precision, specificity interferences, and management criteria. All methods studied appeared to be clinically acceptable; but precision decreased (standard deviations increased) for the last two methods in above-normal ranges.
|
| pubmed:language |
eng
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:chemical | |
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Mar
|
| pubmed:issn |
0009-9147
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
22
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
374-8
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2007-11-15
|
| pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:1253413-Autoanalysis,
pubmed-meshheading:1253413-Bicarbonates,
pubmed-meshheading:1253413-Carbon Dioxide,
pubmed-meshheading:1253413-Evaluation Studies as Topic,
pubmed-meshheading:1253413-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:1253413-Methods,
pubmed-meshheading:1253413-Partial Pressure,
pubmed-meshheading:1253413-Regression Analysis
|
| pubmed:year |
1976
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
Evaluation of contemporary methods for serum CO2.
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study
|