Switch to
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| lifeskim:mentions | |
| pubmed:issue |
1
|
| pubmed:dateCreated |
1976-4-30
|
| pubmed:abstractText |
A comparison of 265 cases of tripel-diagnosis and 112 surgical biopsies of the female breast is reported. In 89,83% of these 265 cases the correct diagnosis was found, in 9,43% the result was doubtful, in 0,75% completely wrong. In 3,77% of these doubtful results the repetition of the tripel-diagnosis gave the correct diagnosis, in 4,15% surgical biopsy we found 2,68% wrong diagnosis. This fact shows the certainty of tripel-diagnosis. In addition the highly significant lower rate of complications, the avoidance of the risk of narcosis and scars and the lower amount of costs show the high clinical value of the so-called tripel-diagnosis.
|
| pubmed:language |
ger
|
| pubmed:journal | |
| pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
| pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
| pubmed:month |
Jan
|
| pubmed:issn |
0016-5751
|
| pubmed:author | |
| pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
| pubmed:volume |
36
|
| pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
| pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
| pubmed:pagination |
33-9
|
| pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
| pubmed:meshHeading | |
| pubmed:year |
1976
|
| pubmed:articleTitle |
[A comparison between so-called triple-diagnosis and surgical biopsy in diagnosis of the female breast (author's transl)].
|
| pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Comparative Study,
English Abstract
|