Linked Life Data

1242860

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/1242860

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
6
pubmed:dateCreated
1976-3-1
pubmed:abstractText
A comparison of clinical skin-tesing using the prick-test and the intracutaneous test with the radio-allergo-sorbent-test (RAST) in 167 patients with different immediate-type allergies showed concordant results in 75.7 per cent of the cases. In 20 per cent of the cases, the skin-test was positive while the simultaneous RAST was negative. Results in male and female patients did not show any important difference. The two test methods agreed well with selected antigens, e.g. grass-pollen, animal-epithelium, fungi and egg white; whereas, the two methods showed considerably different results using tree pollen and housedust as antigens.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
0001-5148
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
30
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
GER
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
1975
pubmed:articleTitle
[The importance of radio-allergo-sorbent-test in comparison with intracutaneous test in diagnosis of allergic diseases].
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study