Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
2002-11-8
pubmed:abstractText
Large series of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair have shown excellent results. However, published comparative studies have had conflicting outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed the first 29 laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs performed at a VA Medical Center from January 2000 to June 2001. The outcome was compared to that of open repairs performed during the same time period. Outcomes between the groups were similar in all respects, except for the length of stay. The conversion rate for the laparoscopic approach was 13.8%. There was one death in the laparoscopic group due to an unrecognized enterotomy. There were three recurrences in the open group and one in the laparoscopic group with a mean follow up of 13 months. In our series, laparoscopic hernia repair resulted in a shorter hospital stay but no other significant benefits, along with a risk of missed enterotomy. The risk-benefit ratio for this procedure may be high during the learning curve.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Dec
pubmed:issn
1265-4906
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
6
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
182-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2002
pubmed:articleTitle
Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair during the learning curve.
pubmed:affiliation
Michael E DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Smith Tower, 6550 Fannin, Suite 1661, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't