Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
2
pubmed:dateCreated
2002-8-14
pubmed:abstractText
The current paradigm in medicine is served by an explanatory model based on scientific positivism. We argue that there are inherent weaknesses in this model: its basis on reductionism, its reliance on linear thinking and its failure to incorporate human values invite a revision of our thinking about knowledge in medicine. We propose that a fresh explanatory model should be based on complexity theory, and argue that this better suits the new era of post-normal medicine, where analytical and predictive power are obtained by stepping back and looking at the relationships and overall context of a system rather than forcing reality into a preferred disciplinary framework. Better at times to be vaguely right, we argue, rather than precisely wrong.
pubmed:commentsCorrections
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
May
pubmed:issn
1356-1294
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
8
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
131-8
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2002
pubmed:articleTitle
Clinical evaluation: constructing a new model for post-normal medicine.
pubmed:affiliation
Research and Development Support Unit, Exeter, UK. k.g.sweeney@exeter.ac.uk
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article