rdf:type |
|
lifeskim:mentions |
|
pubmed:issue |
4
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2002-8-9
|
pubmed:abstractText |
Environmentally friendly hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) pressurised metered-dose inhalers are currently being marketed to replace chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-driven devices. It is uncertain whether these new formulations with different properties are acceptable to patients. Similarly, switching a patient to a dry powder inhaler (DPI) carries the risk of non-acceptance.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal |
|
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical |
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
0025-7931
|
pubmed:author |
|
pubmed:copyrightInfo |
Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
69
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
314-9
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2009-11-11
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:12169743-Adolescent,
pubmed-meshheading:12169743-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:12169743-Aerosol Propellants,
pubmed-meshheading:12169743-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:12169743-Aged, 80 and over,
pubmed-meshheading:12169743-Chlorofluorocarbons,
pubmed-meshheading:12169743-Equipment Design,
pubmed-meshheading:12169743-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:12169743-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:12169743-Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated,
pubmed-meshheading:12169743-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:12169743-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:12169743-Nebulizers and Vaporizers,
pubmed-meshheading:12169743-Patient Satisfaction
|
pubmed:year |
2002
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Moving from CFC aerosol to HFA aerosol or dry powder inhalers: what do patients think?
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Respiratory Department, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK. Thomas.Hartung@tuht.scot.nhs.uk
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Randomized Controlled Trial
|