Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
2002-7-29
pubmed:abstractText
Stress echocardiography is now an everyday clinical tool. However, the substantial evidence base that supports its use is largely derived from expert centres, and concerns have been expressed about the performance of the test in less expert hands. A unifying feature of the problems of stress echocardiography is its subjective assessment. This review examines the consequences of qualitative interpretation and the benefits of developing a quantitative approach. Although no quantitative approach is in widespread clinical use, several alternative techniques are feasible, and this area warrants further study.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Sep
pubmed:issn
1525-2167
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
3
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
171-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2007-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2002
pubmed:articleTitle
Quantitative techniques for stress echocardiography: dream or reality?
pubmed:affiliation
University of Queensland, Australia. tmarwick@medicine.pa.uq.edu.au
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Review, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't