Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:12112488rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021562lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12112488lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0023303lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12112488lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0392756lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12112488lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0023981lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12112488lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0680264lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:dateCreated2002-7-11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:abstractTextA change in payment mechanism for inpatient care from per diem to per episode creates two incentives - a marginal and an average price effect - to change length of stay. The decrease in marginal price per day to zero should reduce the length of stay, while an increase in average price per inpatient stay should increase the length of stay. This study uses data from a natural experiment to estimate both marginal and average price elasticities, and to test whether the length of stay falls after the introduction of prospective payment in a sample of 8509 severely mentally ill patients. We estimate that the marginal price elasticity is zero, but the average price elasticity is between 0.16 and 0.20. The results were generally robust for short- and long stayers, and for persons admitted early and late after the change in payment mechanism. The model controlled for hospital fixed effects and individual random effects.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:issn1057-9230lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NormandSharon...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DickeyBarbara...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NortonEdward...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Van...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LindroothRich...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:copyrightInfoCopyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:volume11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:pagination377-87lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12112488...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12112488...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12112488...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12112488...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12112488...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12112488...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12112488...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12112488...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12112488...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12112488...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12112488...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12112488...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12112488...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12112488...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12112488...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12112488...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12112488...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12112488...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12112488...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:12112488...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:year2002lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:articleTitleDoes prospective payment reduce inpatient length of stay?lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27599-7411, USA. edward.norton@unc.edulld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:12112488pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:12112488lld:pubmed