Linked Life Data

12063733

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/12063733

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
4
pubmed:dateCreated
2002-6-14
pubmed:abstractText
The advantages of full field digital mammography are the excellent and reliable image quality and the reduction of radiation exposure. Image acquisition and display are decoupled in digital mammography allowing for optimization of both independently. Image displays are currently either hardcopy produced with a laser printer or softcopy using a computer monitor. Since the amount of data is high the hardware and software must meet specific technical specifications. The diagnostic accuracy of softcopy and hardcopy interpretation is comparable if a high resolution laser printer and a high quality workstation with high spatial and contrast resolution monitors are used. However, using film display the potential benefits of digital mammography in terms of manipulation of the data is lost. Additional diagnostic benefits might be gained by the combination of softcopy display and computer assisted diagnosis (CAD) and telemammography.
pubmed:language
ger
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Apr
pubmed:issn
0033-832X
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
42
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
265-9
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2002
pubmed:articleTitle
[Soft copy versus hard copy findings in digital mammography].
pubmed:affiliation
Abt. Diagnostische Radiologie, Georg-August-Universität, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Göttingen. mfunke@med.uni-goettingen.de
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract, Evaluation Studies