Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
5
pubmed:dateCreated
2002-6-4
pubmed:abstractText
Quantitation of peripheral blood (PB) CD34(+) cells is now an established method for timing PBPC harvesting. Recent refinements to the dual-platform ISHAGE gating strategy for CD34(+) cells has seen the introduction of microbeads to enable absolute counting of cells on a single instrument platform. This eliminates the need for total WBCC performed on an automated hematology analyzer and potentially increases the analytical precision of the methodology. At the same time, alternative methods for CD34(+) cell enumeration have started to emerge, notably microvolume fluorimetry, which forms the basis of the fully-automated STELLer CD34 method using the Imagn 2000.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:issn
1465-3249
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
2
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
371-6
pubmed:dateRevised
2008-4-24
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2000
pubmed:articleTitle
Comparison of three methods of CD34+ cell enumeration in peripheral blood: dual-platform ISHAGE protocol versus single-platform, versus microvolume fluorimetry.
pubmed:affiliation
Blood and Marrow Transplant Service and Department of Pathology, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Peter McCallum Cancer Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Evaluation Studies