Linked Life Data

12017356

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/12017356

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
1
pubmed:dateCreated
2002-5-17
pubmed:abstractText
We have used the CBDS database of the National Toxicology Program to study the difference between absolute risk and relative risk models for interspecies and intersex predictions of cancer risk. For no combination (class) of tumor and site is the prediction good for all chemicals. The variation in predicted risk between chemicals exceeds the difference in risks resulting from application of these two models. On the whole, it appears that relative risk is a better model.
pubmed:language
eng
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Feb
pubmed:issn
0272-4332
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
22
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
141-57
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2002
pubmed:articleTitle
Absolute risk or relative risk? A study of intraspecies and interspecies extrapolation of chemical-induced cancer risk.
pubmed:affiliation
Department of Physics and Center for Risk Analysis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't