Linked Life Data

11981516

Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11981516

Statements in which the resource exists as a subject.
PredicateObject
rdf:type
lifeskim:mentions
pubmed:issue
3
pubmed:dateCreated
2002-4-30
pubmed:abstractText
The aim of the study was to compare efficacy and side effects produced by two techniques of epidural analgesia during labor: intermittent bolus and patient-controlled epidural analgesia.
pubmed:language
ita
pubmed:journal
pubmed:citationSubset
IM
pubmed:chemical
pubmed:status
MEDLINE
pubmed:month
Mar
pubmed:issn
0375-9393
pubmed:author
pubmed:issnType
Print
pubmed:volume
68
pubmed:owner
NLM
pubmed:authorsComplete
Y
pubmed:pagination
83-7
pubmed:dateRevised
2006-11-15
pubmed:meshHeading
pubmed:year
2002
pubmed:articleTitle
[Epidural analgesia during labor: intermittent bolus or patient controlled administration?].
pubmed:affiliation
Dipartimento di Anestesia e Rianimazione Terapia Intensiva e Antalgica, U.O. Anestesia e Rianimazione Baroncini, Policlinico S. Orsola Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
pubmed:publicationType
Journal Article, Comparative Study, English Abstract