Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11878526
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
5
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2002-3-6
|
pubmed:abstractText |
This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two concentrations of intrathecal ropivacaine, 7.5 and 10 mg ml(-1), in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. One hundred and four patients, ASA I-III, were randomized to receive an intrathecal injection of one of two concentrations of isobaric ropivacaine. Group 1 (n=51) received 2.5 ml of 7.5 mg ml(-1) ropivacaine (18.75 mg). Group 2 (n=53) received 2.5 ml of 10 mg ml(-1) ropivacaine (25 mg). The onset and offset of sensory block at dermatome level T10, maximum upper and lower spread of sensory block and the onset, intensity and duration of motor block were recorded, as were safety data. Onset of motor and sensory block was rapid with no significant differences between the two groups. The median time of onset of sensory block at the T10 dermatome was 2 min (range 1-25 min) in Group 1 and 2 min (range 1-21 min) in Group 2. The median duration of sensory block at the T10 dermatome was 3.0 h (range 0.5-4.2 h) in Group 1 and 3.4 h (1.1-5.9 h) in Group 2 (P=0.002). The median duration of complete motor block was significantly prolonged (P<0.05) in Group 2 compared with Group 1 (1.9 vs 1.2 h, respectively). Anaesthetic conditions were excellent in all but one patient. Intrathecal ropivacaine, in doses of 18.75 and 25 mg, was well tolerated and provided effective anaesthesia for total hip arthroplasty.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:chemical | |
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Nov
|
pubmed:issn |
0007-0912
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
87
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
743-7
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:11878526-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:11878526-Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:11878526-Aged, 80 and over,
pubmed-meshheading:11878526-Amides,
pubmed-meshheading:11878526-Anesthesia, Spinal,
pubmed-meshheading:11878526-Anesthetics, Local,
pubmed-meshheading:11878526-Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip,
pubmed-meshheading:11878526-Double-Blind Method,
pubmed-meshheading:11878526-Drug Administration Schedule,
pubmed-meshheading:11878526-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:11878526-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:11878526-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:11878526-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:11878526-Movement,
pubmed-meshheading:11878526-Pharmaceutical Solutions,
pubmed-meshheading:11878526-Sensation,
pubmed-meshheading:11878526-Specific Gravity,
pubmed-meshheading:11878526-Time Factors
|
pubmed:year |
2001
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Intrathecal ropivacaine for total hip arthroplasty: double-blind comparative study with isobaric 7.5 mg ml(-1) and 10 mg ml(-1) solutions.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Anaesthetics and Intensive Care Medicine, The Queen's University of Belfast, UK.
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Clinical Trial,
Comparative Study,
Randomized Controlled Trial,
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
|