Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:11873026rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007876lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11873026lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0043210lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11873026lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008976lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11873026lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034656lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11873026lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0022864lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11873026lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025376lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11873026lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0002766lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11873026lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0425979lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11873026lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0348016lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11873026lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0002769lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:dateCreated2002-3-1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:abstractTextControversy concerning increased cesarean births as a result of epidural analgesia for relief of labor pain has been attributed, in large part, to difficulties interpreting published studies because of design flaws. In this study, the authors compared epidural analgesia to intravenous meperidine analgesia using patient-controlled devices during labor to evaluate the effects of labor epidural analgesia, primarily on the rate of cesarean deliveries while minimizing limitations attributable to study design.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:issn0003-3022lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:authorpubmed-author:McIntireDonal...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SharmaShiv...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AlexanderJame...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MessickGaryGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BloomSteven...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WileyJackieJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LevenoKenneth...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:volume96lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:pagination546-51lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11873026...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11873026...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11873026...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11873026...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11873026...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11873026...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11873026...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11873026...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11873026...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11873026...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11873026...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11873026...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11873026...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:11873026...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:year2002lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:articleTitleCesarean delivery: a randomized trial of epidural analgesia versus intravenous meperidine analgesia during labor in nulliparous women.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390-9068, USA. shiv.sharma@utsouthwestern.edulld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:11873026pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11873026lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11873026lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:11873026lld:pubmed