Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11781944
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:dateCreated |
2002-1-8
|
pubmed:abstractText |
The study investigated the differences in T-wave morphology between normal controls, patients with an uncomplicated follow-up after a myocardial infarction (MI), and patients with ischaemic heart disease and a history of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF). The study population consisted of 164 healthy patients (age 53.4 +/- 18.7 years old, 80 women), 123 VT/VF patients (age 63.8 +/- 10.1 years old, 15 women), and 196 MI patients (age 59.2 +/- 10.0 years old, 23 women). In all patients, supine resting signal-averaged orthogonal electrocardiograms were obtained. After singular value decomposition of electrocardiogram signal, 2 T-wave morphology descriptors were calculated: total cosine R to T describing the global angle between repolarisation and depolarisation loops, and percentage of loop area expressing the irregularity of the T-wave loop (a more irregular wave results in a lower percentage of loop area value). Both parameters were practically uncorrelated (Controls: r = - .106, MI r = .161, and VT/VF r = .173) and different between individual groups of patients: total cosine R to T (Control vs. MI: P = 4.3 x 10(-8), Control vs. VT/VF: P = 2.7 x 10(-16), MI vs. VT/VF: P = 3.1 x 10(-6)), percentage of loop area (Control vs. MI: P = 0.07, Control vs. VT/VF: P = 1.1 x 10(-8), MI vs. VT/VF: P = 2.9 x 10(-5), all nonparametric Mann-Whitney test). The comparisons of cumulative histograms also revealed significant differences between all three groups for both parameters (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA test). Thus, these numerical descriptors of T-wave morphology are powerful indicators of arrhythmic complications among patients with ischaemic heart disease. They also differentiate between patients with stable uncomplicated ischaemic heart disease and healthy controls.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:issn |
0022-0736
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
34 Suppl
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
113-7
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2009-11-11
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:11781944-Electrocardiography,
pubmed-meshheading:11781944-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:11781944-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:11781944-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:11781944-Middle Aged,
pubmed-meshheading:11781944-Myocardial Infarction,
pubmed-meshheading:11781944-Myocardial Ischemia,
pubmed-meshheading:11781944-Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted,
pubmed-meshheading:11781944-Tachycardia, Ventricular,
pubmed-meshheading:11781944-Ventricular Fibrillation
|
pubmed:year |
2001
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
T-wave morphology differences between patients with and without arrhythmic complication of ischemic heart disease.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Cardiological Sciences, St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, England. k.hnatkova@sghms.ac.uk
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article
|