Source:http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/pubmed/id/11781048
Switch to
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
lifeskim:mentions | |
pubmed:issue |
3
|
pubmed:dateCreated |
2002-1-8
|
pubmed:abstractText |
In this article we examine whether the distribution of function across the right and left cerebral hemispheres for lexical processing is influenced by the global context within which words are presented. A review of previously published studies indicates that the ubiquitous right visual field (RVF)/left hemisphere advantage for word recognition may be reduced or eliminated for nouns, content words, or high image words, but only when such items are presented along with verbs, function words, or low image words. However, paradoxically, when the former items are presented in more homogeneous contexts, the RVF advantage is uniformly observed. We propose that the processing efficiency of a hemisphere for a given stimulus depends on that item's relation to the other stimuli provided, that is, the global context. This was examined in a visual half-field experiment that varied whether high and low image nouns were presented in homogeneous (blocked lists) or heterogeneous (mixed lists) contexts. An unvarying RVF advantage was observed for high image words in homogeneous contexts, but this advantage was eliminated when the same items were presented in heterogeneous contexts. We suggest that stimulus heterogeneity maximizes reliance on differing, but complementary, computational biases across hemispheres. Hence, the extent to which the left and right hemispheres are recruited for the recognition of individual word types can vary dynamically with variation in the stimulus environment.
|
pubmed:language |
eng
|
pubmed:journal | |
pubmed:citationSubset |
IM
|
pubmed:status |
MEDLINE
|
pubmed:month |
Dec
|
pubmed:issn |
0093-934X
|
pubmed:author | |
pubmed:copyrightInfo |
Copyright 2001 Elsevier Science.
|
pubmed:issnType |
Print
|
pubmed:volume |
79
|
pubmed:owner |
NLM
|
pubmed:authorsComplete |
Y
|
pubmed:pagination |
360-78
|
pubmed:dateRevised |
2006-11-15
|
pubmed:meshHeading |
pubmed-meshheading:11781048-Adult,
pubmed-meshheading:11781048-Brain,
pubmed-meshheading:11781048-Cognition,
pubmed-meshheading:11781048-Environment,
pubmed-meshheading:11781048-Female,
pubmed-meshheading:11781048-Functional Laterality,
pubmed-meshheading:11781048-Humans,
pubmed-meshheading:11781048-Imagination,
pubmed-meshheading:11781048-Male,
pubmed-meshheading:11781048-Questionnaires,
pubmed-meshheading:11781048-Reaction Time,
pubmed-meshheading:11781048-Visual Fields,
pubmed-meshheading:11781048-Vocabulary
|
pubmed:year |
2001
|
pubmed:articleTitle |
Does global context modulate cerebral asymmetries? A review and new evidence on word imageability effects.
|
pubmed:affiliation |
Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside 92521, USA. christine.chiarello@ucr.edu
|
pubmed:publicationType |
Journal Article,
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
|